Chike Obi (April
17, 1921 – March 13, 2008) was a Nigerian politician, mathematician and
professor.
The African Mathematics Union suggests
that he was the first Nigerian to hold a doctorate in mathematics. Dr. Obi's
early research dealt mainly with the question of the existence of periodic
solutions of non-linear ordinary differential equations. He successfully used
the perturbation technique, and several of his publications greatly helped to
stimulate research interest in this subject throughout the world and have
become classics in the literature.
Obi is the author of several books and journals on mathematics and
Nigerian politics.
Early Life and Education
Obi was educated in various parts of Nigeria before reading mathematics as an external student of the University of
London. Immediately after
his first degree, he won a scholarship to do research study at Pembroke
College, Cambridge, followed by
doctoral studies at Massachusetts
Institute of Technology in Cambridge,
Massachusetts, United States,
becoming in 1950, the first Nigerian to receive a PhD in mathematics.
Career as Mathematician
Obi returned to lecture at the
premier Nigerian University of Ibadan. He was soon diverted from
this by political activities. After the war, he returned to lecture in 1970 at
the University of Lagos where he quickly rose
to the senior academic role of a professor.
He left Lagos to return to his root in the city of Onitsha,
establishing the Nanna Institute
for Scientific Studies.
Obi had won the Sigvard Eklund Prize for
original work in differential equation from the International Centre for Theoretical
Physics. He was a university teacher
until his retirement as an Emeritus Professor in 1985.
In 1997, Obi became the third person to solve Fermat’s Last Theorem after Andrew Wiles and Richard Taylor in 1994. He
also claimed to have found an elementary proof to Fermat’s Last Theorem. This work was carried
out at his Nanna Institute
for Scientific Studies in Onitsha, Eastern Nigeria and
published in Algebras, Groups and Geometries. However, a review of this proof
published in Mathematical Reviews indicates that it was
a false proof.
No comments:
Post a Comment